the FRIDAY POLITIC ~ because one can’t be transcendent all the time
I haven’t really followed the presidential campaign, because sometimes you need a break. I have listened a little about China’s crackdown in Tibet. China, where the Olympics will be held this Summer. The Olympics being one of few events on the world stage where the competition is (usually) healthy and on some level, boundaries of culture, race, ethnicity, etc., are overcome for a least a little while.
So. Here is China stomping brutally and fatally all over a people and their culture, then getting ready to turn around and welcome the rest of the world to its doorstep. Watch carefully to see them wipe off their boots before they reach the door.
I’ve been wondering, should we protest these Olympics? I understand that there are complexities in the Geo-political relationships around the world, and that things have to be measured and situations and consequences taken into account. And maybe avoiding the Olympics is the wrong thing to do, because we need to connect with the Chinese people, themselves, and this is an opportunity to do that.
That may be the best way to get the government to change. The pressure needs to be exerted on the inside as well. You can’t isolate all of those people from the rest of the world, and expect that one day they will realize they’d like more freedom, if they can never see it.
This is what I have a problem with: Our country probably won’t even have a serious discussion about these Olympics. Not because of any other issue, except this one: We’re too concerned with our economic relationship with China to put it in jeopardy. So, we’ll just not worry too much about Tibet.
I don’t have a problem taking economics into account. And there is a good argument that China is becoming more open out of economic necessity, which has other results. I just wish money were not the first compelling reason to do or not do whatever it is. Alas, in so many things, the bottom line is the motivation.